Raining, validation, and testing datasets at a ratio of 5:1:four. The distinct pixel number for every category is shown in Table three.Remote Sens. 2021,Remote Sens. 2021, 13, x FOR PEER Review 13,12 Icosabutate Cancer ofFigure 10. Instruction, validation, and testing samples of every tree category with the correct labels.Figure ten. Education, validation, and testing samples of each tree category with all the correct labels. Table 3. Pixels of coaching, validation, and testing for every single tree category. Table three. Pixels of training, validation, and testing for every single tree category. Sample’s Pixel Quantity Categories Sample’s Pixel NumberTotal Education Validation Testing CategoriesEarly infected pinepine trees Late infected trees Late infected pine trees Broad-leaved trees Total Broad-leaved trees TotalEarly infected pine trees163,628 163,628 242,107 242,107 100,163 505,898 one hundred,Training32,726 48,421 20,033 101,505,Validation 130,902 32,726 193,685 48,421 80,130 20,033 404,717 101,Testing 327,256 130,902 484,213 193,685 200,326 1,011,795 80,130 404,Total 327,256 484,213 200,326 1,011,The classification accuracy was assessed by calculating the producer accuracy (PA), The general accuracy (OA), as well as the Kappa calculating the producer average accuracy (AA),classification accuracy was assessed by coefficient worth [46]. Theaccuracy average accuracy (AA), overall accuracy (OA), plus the Kappa coefficient value [46 formulas are as follows: formulas are as follows: PA = right classification pixel number of each class/total pixel variety of every single class (2) PA = right classification pixel variety of each class/total pixel quantity of each class Kappa = (OA – eAccuracy)/(1 – eAccuracy) (three) Kappa = (OA – eAccuracy)/(1 – eAccuracy) k eAccuracy = ( i=1kV p Vm)/S2 (4) eAccuracy = ( i=1 Vp Vm)/S2 where OA is overall accuracy, k is definitely the variety of categories, Vp will be the predicted value, Vm exactly where OA is S will be the sample number. would be the measured worth, and all round accuracy, k is the number of categories, Vp would be the predicted valu would be the measured worth, and S will be the sample quantity. 3. Final results 3. Outcomes The reflectance curves of broad-leaved trees, early infected pine trees, and late infectedThe reflectance curves in Figure 11. Of trees, early infected and trees, pine trees inside 400000 nm are MAC-VC-PABC-ST7612AA1 Description depicted of broad-leaved the broad-leaved treespine two and la fected pine trees inside 400000 nm are depicted was most 11. With the broad-leaved stages of infected pines, the difference in the spectral reflectance in Figure obvious in the and two stages of infected pines, the difference in the spectral reflectance was most green peak (52080 nm), red edge (66080 nm), and NIR (72000 nm). Additionally, the ous in incorrectly classified early infected pine trees into broad-leaved (72000 nm) models we used nonetheless the green peak (52080 nm), red edge (66080 nm), and NIR trees thermore, early infected used nevertheless incorrectly classified early infected pine tree because the spectrum from the models wepine trees is comparable to that of broad-leaved trees (Figure 11). broad-leaved trees because the spectrum of early infected pine trees is equivalent to t broad-leaved trees (Figure 11).Remote Sens. 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW14 ofRemote Sens. 2021, 13, x FOR PEER Review Remote Sens. 2021, 13,14 of 23 13 ofFigure 11. The reflectance curve of broad-leaved trees, early infected pine trees, and late infected pine trees.Figure 11. The reflectance curve of broad-leaved trees, early infected pine trees, and late infected pine trees. Figure 11. The reflectan.